Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia and neural ensembles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Rob Church Talk | FAHD 01:04, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Well intentioned maybe, but clearly original research. gren グレン 22:22, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. OR. feydey 22:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There is nothing original in this article. It only explains findings of neuroscientists who showed that large number of 'noisy' contributors can produce good information. Wikipedia uses the same principle. Many of the Neuroscience results are from the 1980s, and the principle of Wikipedia is common knowledge. References are provided. You are welcome to revise the article to make it sound less 'original'. (Unsigned by 24.163.65.156)
- Comment. The article is about brain research with references to that. No references to sources like: Researchers have concluded that WP works like neural ensembles. Words like: appears to, common knowledge are not convincing, expressed by gren: Well intentioned maybe, but clearly original research. Original research is very hard to rewrite, since it contains assumptions and no/very little/very new research. Still the article is well written, so consider moving the appropriate parts to other articles. feydey 23:48, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:NOR, clearly a novel interpretation, sorry. I'd like to see it in the wikipedia namespace or as a user page. Kappa 00:24, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- MOVED UPON CONSENSUS I've moved this text to neural ensemble and deleted most of the comparisons to Wikipedia (which are obvious, not original at all) except one.
- No vote, but I don't really see evidence of a consensus of any kind here. --Jacquelyn Marie 04:14, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- By 'consensus'I meant the desire expressed by several experts not to have this article linked directly to Wikipedia.
- No vote, but I don't really see evidence of a consensus of any kind here. --Jacquelyn Marie 04:14, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research. -- Kjkolb 15:16, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.