Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (6th nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was tedium. ‑Scottywong| squeal _ 19:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia[edit]
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An organisation that is obviously written by its own users and employers who obvious has a COI-problem. It also has copyvio-problem, it is not referring that is has copied everything from Wikipedia. (t) Josve05a (c) 19:10, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COI and well every guideline on here really... --→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.