Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wicked cast lists
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per WP:NOT.. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wicked cast lists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This pretty much defines indiscriminate collection of information. Wikipedia is not the place for a cast list such as this. Part of my problem with it is the scope. If they include these productions, why not local productions? What I mean to say is that it doesn't actually tell us anything, i.e. it's indiscriminate. WoohookittyWoohoo! 08:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 09:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. External links with casts can be given in the wicked article. This list is too indiscriminate, and could grow for ever.Yobmod (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment And it has. :) Basically every time a new production has started, more names have been added. The thing is, the Internet Broadway Database (and others. There are several like it) has plenty of information like this. Better place for it. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 11:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per WP:NOT --Bardcom (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please don't delete this page. If you want local productions then add them. It's not Wicked's fault. Please don't delete it. It is useful to know if anyone new has joined in case you want to watch it. It gives a detailed look at the cast and productions history. Jack —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.128.242 (talk) 16:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.