Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why I Hate the Left

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Burleigh Smith. The Bushranger One ping only 07:23, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why I Hate the Left[edit]

Why I Hate the Left (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets none of the WP:NFILM criteria, appears to be no secondary coverage at all available online. January (talk) 22:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Burleigh Smith. I don't see significant coverage in reliable sources. In fact, there only seem to be about 13 Google results for "why I hate the left" "Burleigh Smith" -wikipedia -wikimedia. I'm not honestly sure that he's notable, either, but it'll do for now. The bio seems to have been started by the filmmaker himself, and I wouldn't be surprised if his filmography was similarly made to promote Smith. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 06:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
alts:
director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
extended:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
specific:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Delete or userfy for now, per being somewhat TOO SOON. While the film is completed and is sourcable, its newness affects available sourcing. We can certainly allow a resurrection if/or when it gains better coverage. That said, I am okay with a redirect to Burleigh Smith, with that same proviso.. a return if/when it gains notability. Schmidt, Michael Q. 19:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:14, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.