Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who We Are (Flyleaf album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 18:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Who We Are (Flyleaf album)[edit]
- Who We Are (Flyleaf album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to have achieved notability. AllMusic has an entry, but it's empty except for a track listing: http://www.allmusic.com/album/who-we-are-mw0002559453 Tagged for notability since its release and two months on, no new support. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. And it peaked 35 on Billboard's "Top Christian Albums" category (see your Allmusic link) Deadbeef 05:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Deadbeef and per Blabbermouth Sydney City News, "Nobody's worked on it!" isn't a good rationale for deletion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Plenty of coverage out there. Seems strange to remind an experienced nominator of WP:BEFORE, but... Sergecross73 msg me 12:24, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per Deadbeef. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 21:42, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Appears to meet WP:NALBUM per Deadbeef's links above. - Aoidh (talk) 23:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.