Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Marsh Volunteer Fire Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to White Marsh, Maryland. Clear consensus against keeping the article. There was support for merging some of the information based on the relevance of the Volunteer Fire Company, so I'll close as merge (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

White Marsh Volunteer Fire Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no assertion of notability. Nothing historic mentioned in article. I am sure there are media accounts of fires they have fought but so what? A fire department fights fires. John from Idegon (talk) 05:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 07:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 07:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 05:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, selectively, per Northamerica1000, probably to White Marsh, Maryland. It can be mentioned in the same way a White Marsh Library is mentioned in that article. The "history" section of the current article is on the margin of perhaps too closely paraphrasing from its source (the history page of the fire station itself); the source is interesting enough and useful for supporting a mention in the White Marsh article. --doncram 20:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 01:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.