Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Bus Services

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:23, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

White Bus Services[edit]

White Bus Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bus company fails WP:CORP & WP:GNG I've only found this [1] and everything on GBooks is to do with a South African company. –Davey2010Talk 22:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transport-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010Talk 18:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010Talk 18:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'm stunned that a company with so much history and local importance has received so little coverage in reliable sources, but there you go. Fails WP:ORG unless there's a lot of stuff offline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.240.243 (talkcontribs)

Delete- I won't be surprised if this page can be recreated once it has reliable sources in the future. For now, it will be delete for me.Amitbanerji26 (talk) 16:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.