Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whihala Beach County Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. /Nom Withdrawn. StarM 15:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whihala Beach County Park

This article has notability issues, and slightly promo. I vote delete. Dengero (talk) 09:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There has to be a logical limit beneath which a location does not have an article, and this is below it. Stifle (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete County parks can be notable, but they have to demonstrate it: no reason to believe that this one is notable. Nyttend (talk) 15:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references. -- Eastmain (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It appears to pass inclusion standards per references added by Eastmain. --Oakshade (talk) 05:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggestion. Delete the Opening Hours and Features bit to erase the promo problem now that we fixed the notability issue. Dengero (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment. Done. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 01:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if there can be enough information to get passed an address. Tavix (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I added some more and removed promotional material. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 01:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I withdraw the afd as notability has been established by Eastmain, and promo material has been removed. Thankyou! Dengero (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Still not certain if the additional information or sources establish notability. They probably do but just barely and the nominator has withdrawn. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 15:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.