Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When True Night Falls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Coldfire Trilogy. Strongest argument appears to be in favour of a merge. While there is some notability, as established by sources provided, it seems there isn't enough to sustain an individual article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When True Night Falls[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet Wikipedia:Notability (books) RJFJR (talk) 04:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This novel is part of a VERY well-known sci-fi series (well, very well-known for a modern series anyways) and by a well-known author. This is the second book in the series though, so depending on what I find once I look for citations potentially it should be merged with Black Sun Rising into an article on the Coldfire Trilogy. UsernameRedacted (talk) 23:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Appears to have been reviewed by Library Journal, Booklist, Kirkus Reviews, and Publisher's Weekly - [[1]]. UsernameRedacted (talk) 00:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on all the reviews found by UsernameRedacted. Edward321 (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I think it would be fine to merge this, along with Black Sun Rising and Crown of Shadows, to The Coldfire Trilogy. There are plenty of reviews, so I think that the book is notable, but there isn't really much to say specific to this particular volume of the series. We should just redirect all three and then there would be enough info for a decent article. UsernameRedacted (talk) 22:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It could be merged if you want to post all the summaries on one page, but that could be rather long, otherwise keep them as is and restore the Crown of Shadows Page. Either way, I believe the summaries should remain in existence in some form and not be completely deleted as was done to Crown of Shadows (though I saved that page to my computer from Google cache when I saw it had been deleted, so I have it available) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.231.145.77 (talk) 05:32, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.