Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheel of Fortune set evolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was MERGE into Wheel of Fortune. Herostratus 07:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wheel of Fortune set evolution[edit]

Utter cruft of extremely limited interest and notability. —tregoweth (talk) 00:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as cruft.--Jersey Devil 01:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NoelleWiley 18:39, 1 August 31 2006 (UTC) Shouldnt really be here... Maybe catergorize(sp?) it with 'Wheel of fortune'??
Delete Crufty. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 01:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Gives fancruft a Bad Name. --Dennette 02:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Who notices these things? --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 ^{talk contribs Count} 05:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone else. JIP | Talk 09:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above, too close to the grain for an encyclopedia. Now, the evolution of the Jeopardy! set, that's worth an article. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Er, uh, we have Jeopardy! set evolution as well. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG Keep - I don't give a damn about WOF, but it is notable, and the way it's set has cahnged over time is an important part of teh show. perhaps the article could do with some work, clean up and a better title - but that is not grounds for deletion. it is not "fancruft"--ZayZayEM 14:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
D L T (please send $250 directly to me to buy a vowel). Only notable item is the move to the electronic puzzle board, which did make news. But that is worth 2 sentences in the main article at best. —Twigboy 14:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Wheel of Fortune Cynical 21:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn —Khoikhoi 01:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Jeopardy! set evolution was recently listed for AfD and the result was keep. Deletion of some other set evolution article in light of this may build systemic bias. Tinlinkin 04:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Wheel of Fortune is appropriate in this instance. Tinlinkin 23:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Wheel of Fortune JTRH 23:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Wheel of Fortune; useless information, but possibly notable for fans, and doesn't deserve its own article. --Dennis The TIger 01:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Wheel of Fortune. There's some bits of info here that have potential within the WOF article proper. [[Briguy52748 18:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)]][reply]
STRONG Keep or Merge - The WOF set has changed just as much as if not much more than the Jeopardy set. CrossEyed7 05:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
MERGE -- And expand if possible. --Aussie Evil 04:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.