Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whalallapa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whalallapa[edit]

Probable hoax with only 80 google hits which are largely wikipedia and mirrors or other sites that are open to public editing. Cool3 00:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless strong sources provided. All the elements of a hoax, and we can't take chances. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If this is not a serious entry, then it is a terribly-planned hoax. Such a country does not exist within the fictional catalogues of Canadian libraries, and if it does, its presence would be limited. If not a waste of space, clean-up is required. —Eternal Equinox | talk 00:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Whalallapa only exist in word of mouth" is another way of saying it's unverifiable and/or original research and/or a unverifiable, possible hoax, and either way it's just plain silly. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 01:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT. It's not necessarily a hoax, but it's unencyclopedic anyway. Royboy crashfan 02:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Complete bollocks Nonsense, made up, and/or, as above, just plain silly. Fan1967 02:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this folderol ASAP. dbtfz ^talk 03:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Vary | Talk 04:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What nonsense! Funny though. Eivind 05:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable, probably a hoax. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 06:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nonsense article. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 09:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, hoax and nonsense. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Complete bollocks. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-03 13:36Z
Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 19:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Word of mouth. Not worthy for Wiki. --Krashlandon (e) 21:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 02:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.