Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wevie Stonder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn Wizardman 16:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wevie Stonder[edit]

Doesn't appear to pass notability standards. I found one reference, but it still fails WP:RS as it lacks multiple reliable sources. Wizardman 01:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No assertion of notability, all recordings and band members are red-linked, only "references" are Myspace and the band's website, hmm.... sounds like a text book case of Speedy Delete to me. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 03:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to Keep due to Michig's sources. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 14:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:MUSIC, particularly all of the basic criteria. Sounds (ignoring the pun) like a garage band to me. ThePointblank (talk) 07:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Google search found these [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. These show plenty of coverage, heavy airplay, radio session for the BBC. You didn't find these?--Michig (talk) 08:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the article using these sources - I don't think it can really be considered deletable now. And by the way, four albums on Skam is an assertion of notability (per WP:MUSIC), and the speedy deletion tag should not have been added.--Michig (talk) 09:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.