Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weston G. Wetzel
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jamie☆S93 17:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weston G. Wetzel[edit]
- Weston G. Wetzel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Acting student that has done lighting work for a series of amateur college plays. Non-notable Passportguy (talk) 14:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BIO. Facebook, check. Twitter, check. Absinthedrinkrecipes.com, check. Wikipedia, check. Drawn Some (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no indication of notability (and it seems to be autobiography). Sorry, Weston, but have a look at WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER to get an idea of the notability standards in your field. JohnCD (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 18:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. It's not easy for a person to achieve notability as a lighting designer for theater. One would probably have to get nominated for a Tony Award or something at a similar level before achieving notability as a lighting designer. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as searches find verification of his career, but nothing at all that shows it as notable. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A lighting designer with little to no coverage in reliable sources is nowhere near notable. This easily fails WP:BIO. Timmeh!(review me) 00:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.