Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Plaza Bonita

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Westfield Plaza Bonita[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I want a TNT, due to the fact that it's probably not notable, and the current article was written by conflicted editors and has 0 encyclopedic value. My solution would be to redirect the page to Westfield Group until such a time that a neutral tone article showing notability has been created. I was bold and tried to do this, but got reverted. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:22, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, clearly notable, when searched with "Plaza Bonita", plenty of hits in GNews, GBooks, GScholar, and HighBeam. Nominator should do WP:BEFORE. The fact that there may have been a COI problem does not mean you delete every article as a knee-jerk reaction. GregJackP Boomer! 01:46, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. GregJackP Boomer! 01:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes notability and there is no issue with COI since there was only a single edit by a single editor and that edit was deleted.--JOJ ^Hutton 02:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:SNOW. This appears to be among a group of bad nominations over an unrelated COI issue. - Wikidemon (talk) 03:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:46, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.