Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Pacific Production

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Western Pacific Production[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages because of lack of sources suggesting notability. Google results were a bit odd. When I searched on "Prashant Passy Pilley" I got "about 28,900" yet when I clicked through I ended up with 27. See also the Bing search: [1]. He worked on Supernatural, but [2] lists him as just one of many, working on 2 episodes.

AAs for the production company, I also failed to find sources that suggest it meets WP:ORG, I did find them advertising on a free site several years ago. [3] If you look at [4] they claim to be working on Bond 24, but A search for "Bond 24" and "Western Pacific Production" turns up only that web page. Ditto the claim to be working with Tim Conrad (not Conrade) Dougweller (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Western Pacific Production : Delete – The current situation of this company and the article seems to be limited with the facebook, justdial, and other online registrations. There is nothing notable about it. There are some stuff on net, adding that there will be some scope if their claims are correct, so the article can be created in future if any of these claims happen to be true. OccultZone (Talk) 13:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Prashant Passy Pilley : Delete – Although I could see more than 80,000 results concerning this name. After my discussion with Dougweller I have made a study on this subject. There is hardly anything notable about the subject. 99% of the content comes from the blog of the person, it can be considered as promotional. There is only one good source that would indicate the importance of this person,[5], but that is about some 'upcoming' project. OccultZone (Talk) 14:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 14:34, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.