Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Georgia Liberation Front
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 01:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Even if there were more than 87 Google hits, I still wouldn't consider a college debate team notable in and of itself. Daniel Case 05:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable student group, no longer exists so no chance to make itself more notable. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 05:59Z
- Delete per Quarl -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Nothing worth merging to West Georgia or policy debate. (ESkog)(Talk) 07:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Werdna648T/C\@ 09:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Appears to be a spoof debating team. The name sounds more like a revolutionary paramtiliaty organization. Blnguyen 00:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I created this article. I didn't have time to finish it but I think your application of the notability guidelines is misdirected. WGLF is certainly notable within the field of policy debate as a truly groundbreaking project. They got at-large bids to the National Debate Tournament just telling jokes. The fact that they have mainstream media coverage (the CSTV documnetary) is also notable in my mind. Your qualms about the name are not reasons for deletion. Also the number of google hits makes them THE most notable policy debate team. Debator 01:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I once got laughs on tv telling a joke at the Bi-Annual National Pinball Convention...unfortunately, doesn't merit a Wiki article. On the other hand though, assuming you're familiar with the subject, I'm sure you have a lot you could improve on the policy debate article itself :) Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 02:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.