Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Bank Second League

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Football in the State of Palestine. Liz Read! Talk! 07:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

West Bank Second League[edit]

West Bank Second League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NSPORT. I have been unable to find sources related to this league, though may exist in other languages. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade: Are you aware that people speak Arabic in the West Bank? Do you know how to look for phrases in Arabic? gidonb (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gidonb: Yes, I am aware that people speak Arabic in the West Bank. I'm not sure what you're getting at. Coverage about a football team may be available in the language spoken where the team is located (in this case, Arabic) or in other languages if they play teams from other regions. As stated in the original nomination, coverage on the team may be available in other languages (including Arabic). However, I do not know how to search for sources in languages other than English, especially languages, e.g., Arabic, that do not use the Roman alphabet. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep. The process that nom describes above (and unfortunately it took two rounds to get this information out in sufficient detail) seems well intended but CANNOT be accepted as a serious WP:BEFORE. gidonb (talk) 13:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not speedy keep eligible since others have voted against keeping it. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't against keeping deleting? I think everyone else wants this redirected. No problem with that. gidonb (talk) 00:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.