Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Yoder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wes Yoder[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, specifically WP:SIGCOV. Page has been tagged with questionable notability since 2009. Cited and found articles only mention him briefly, such as "being represented by Wes Yoder" and do not actually discuss Yoder. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Needs more references and substantial improvement to pass WP:GNG. TenderKing (talk) 13:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Per aboove, does not satisfy WP:GNG· Alex-h (talk) 09:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks notability. Barca (talk) 21:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I found several sources leading me to believe he may pass WP:GNG. I will be adding them to the article in the next hour. Reviewers may want to hold off commenting and admins from closing until I do this and others have a chance to evaluate. Thanks.4meter4 (talk) 18:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.