Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werewolf Priest
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TravellingCari 03:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Werewolf Priest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I strongly suspect this is a hoax, or at least a synthesis of unrelated material (and misleading). There is an Irish legend of a priest and a werewolf (not a werewolf priest), and a bunch of other loosely connected material which is not referenced. A google search on "werewolf priest" yields mirrors of this page, or gaming material. The article creator is long gone and contributed nothing apart from this article. I mused on PRODding it but felt this forum geve more chance of structured debate Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS: If someone does provide some unambiguous source material, I'll happily withdraw the nom. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original synthesis of mostly unrelated material. What is it with all these poorly sourced werewolf articles this week? AlexTiefling (talk) 14:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely agree that this is synthesis and WP:MADEUP. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The article has no reliable sources, probably a hoax and the story is basically generic to all werwolves and offers nothing different to the werewolf article except OR and poor writing... Delete. Spawn Man (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MADEUP.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.