Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Williams (porn star)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (Non-admin closure) per WP:SNOW...and Wendy better put some clothing on or she'll catch a cold! Ecoleetage (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wendy Williams (porn star)[edit]
- Wendy Williams (porn star) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I have nominated this article based on my reasoning at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Devine. Not a notable enough person for a Wikipedia article, and at worst, self-promotional. MartinShadow (talk) 04:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 04:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Meets WP:PORNBIO as she was nominated at least once for an AVN award. Tabercil (talk) 04:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:PORNBIO. At least one verifiable AVN nomination.[1]. • Gene93k (talk) 04:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:PORNBIO. You reasons for the AfD read like a cross between WP:IDONTLIKEIT & WP:OTHERSTUFF BTW. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 04:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the above, probably a WP:SNOW keep at this stage. JBsupreme (talk) 08:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. AVN nomination satisfies WP:PORNBIO. 23skidoo (talk) 17:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep award history satisfies WP:PORNBIO. Recommend WP:SNOWHorrorshowj (talk) 09:55, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.