Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Barrie-Wilson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:52, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy Barrie-Wilson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quite questionably notable and improvable for WP:CREATIVE as my searches of "Wendy Barrie-Wilson actress" at Books, News and Highbeam only found the expected passing mentions and also IMDb noticeably summarizes her career to apparently not satisfying the notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four movies, three TV shows, born in 1954. Notability is an issue. Delete 45sixtyone (talk) 06:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:48, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The actor is primarily a stage actor has appeared in "more than 90 plays on Broadway and around the world". That would explain why there are few tv and film credits. Seems to have some reliable coverage online, including in The New York Times.--Prisencolin (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sufficent sourcing to pass GNG. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 23:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:ARTIST. Article needs a rewrite though. --MurderByDeletionism^"bang!" 21:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - FWIW though, the NYTimes article is basically a few paragraphs, hardly solid in-depth coverage and frankly that's all this article has, nothing else to suggest better satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 07:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes our general notability guidelines, as well as our more specific ones as well. The article is certainly a bit messy, but I'll work on cleaning it up shortly. Hallward's Ghost ^(Kevin) ^{(My talkpage)} 20:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.