Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weinberger Law Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weinberger Law Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article reads like an adverstisement, doesn't appear to meet notability guidlines. tenleaders.com is the only reference that isn't associated with the law firm or is not user generated, and it doesn't seem to imply notability of the subject. WookieInHeat (talk) 22:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, and: (1) Ten Leaders is not a reliable source by any stretch; (2) there is no evidence that any one of the seven attorneys meet my standards for notability of attorneys. Bearian (talk) 22:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional article, lacks depth of coverage required by guidelines. Most of the sources are incidental mentions of the firm, and there is trivia such as someone's "AV" rating, which is pretty meaningless. The article is padded with trivia such as a section on pro bono work, which every firm does, and a long section on its practice areas. Figureofnine (talk) 15:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pretty much spam and little more. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sources used do not appear independent or reliable and there is no indication that proper sourcing can be found.--Pink Bull 19:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.