Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weightism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weightism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This reads as basically 100% editorial. quite literally zero used sources. zero neutrality whatsoever. there isn't a single thing that isn't just conjecture. 68.227.167.123 (talk) 08:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I completed the AfD for the IP. ansh 666 06:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or possibly redirect to Anti-fat bias. Hard to see why this wasn't speedy deleted, it's all OR and there's nothing encyclopaedic about it. Neiltonks (talk) 12:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Mostly unsourced, the one sourced sentence that was added since this AfD was opened would be better at Anti-fat bias. I don't think this would be a good redirect to there, though, both because it appears to be a neologism and because "discrimination or stereotyping based on one's weight" presumably could refer to very thin people as well. Egsan Bacon (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.