Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wei Han (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wei Han[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was nominated for deletion, but the user who did so tacked their nomination onto the first AfD discussion (diff). Below is the rationale for deletion provided. I am presently neutral. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Company may be notable but not CEO. Kavdiamanju (talk) 04:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now unless this can be mentioned elsewhere as it seems the current sources are the best coverage. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative delete As always with simple Chinese names there can be multiple people with that exact name, and many more if you just base off the transcription. The first AfD is probably someone/something completely different. But appears that this Han Wei is just an investor on movies say The Moon and the Sun (film) instead of actually working on cinematography. [1][2] (routinal) [3] (more about company) 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 06:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Tough one to research as per Hisashiyarouin, but I also agree with their assessment. Can't show the notability of this particular person. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.