Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weed grinder
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Herb grinder. (non-admin closure) feminist 09:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- Weed grinder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article should be deleted as the subject of the article is not notable. A WP:BEFORE search found no significant coverage of the subject in reliable and independent sources. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 03:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Per WP:GNG. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 04:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 15:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 15:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Redirect to Herb grinder. I'd say merge and redirect, but the article creator has already put all relevant (and some dubious) information in both articles. LadyofShalott 15:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Herb grinder. Same reasons as given by LadyofShalott. The material is completely duplicative but the search term is plausible and a redirect is cheap. Msnicki (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.