Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WeeMee (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator without any dissenting voices. It'd be a good idea if those who keep opining Keep here (and at the last AfD) actually put some of those sources into the article though, or there'll inevitably be a 4th AfD. Black Kite (talk) 19:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WeeMee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any reliable independent sources, also the article doesn't contain any. Only source contained is the WeeWorld website. Delete or merge into WeeWorld, although that article seems like a massive advert for the game. ~~ Sintaku ^Talk 23:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw - I did realise there were some sources for it. I did a simple Google Search and couldn't find any reliable ones. Don't know why they aren't in the article after the last AfD nomination. ~~ Sintaku ^Talk 10:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There appear to be quite a few sources available with a quick search. Some are also listed in the 2nd AFD Nomiantion, but do not appear to be in the article anymore. The article history should be checked over. It appears that several references where removed by an IP editor who copy and pasted content while editing, see this diff [1]. -- ferret (talk) 02:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, some prior references at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WeeMee&diff=488242592&oldid=483791059, also good arguments for retention and improvement both at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WeeMee and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WeeMee (2nd nomination). Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 03:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Previous AfD shows that well more than two sources were found. I see nothing new here to review. Unscintillating (talk) 01:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.