Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weck jar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Neither the nom nor the "keep" !votes are heavily policy based. The references in the article are minimal. Personally, I would think that a merge to home canning would be a good solution and I recommend to open a merge discussion on the article's talk page. Randykitty (talk) 17:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weck jar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not seem to offer anything new over what is in Home canning and does not seem to warrant its own article. Stesmo (talk) 22:27, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The topic is notable by this title and so deletion would be disruptive. Andrew (talk) 22:42, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as passes GNG, –Davey2010 • (talk) 00:55, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We have articles like Mason jar which are notable enough to stand on their own. I can't see why this wouldn't be able to stand on it's own either Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 16:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.