Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webkul
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Webkul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly promotional article with few non-trivial, independent sources. Most are press releases, company summaries, sources published by the company itself, or interview transcripts. Independent sources listed essentially repeat press release claims, making them no better at establishing notability. Appable (talk | contributions) 07:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as corporate spam; no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:02, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Insufficient sources available to meet WP:GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 06:22, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - sources are not independent, the article looks like spam and I can't find anything useful/reliable/independent that could be added. - Sitush (talk) 19:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.