Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webfmt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 01:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Webfmt[edit]

Webfmt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was originally prodded in 2011 shortly after creation by User:AndrewWTaylor, and deprodde by creator with not much attention paid to this since. I think tjat the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement, and I am not seeing anything better in GNews/GBooks. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 07:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Still no evidence of notability, or any independent references. (Thanks to Piotrus for bringing this back to my attention). AndrewWTaylor (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2015 (UTC) AndrewWTaylor (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Searches noticeably found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 00:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.