Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebSpellChecker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 00:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WebSpellChecker[edit]

WebSpellChecker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I renamed this from "WebSpellChecker Software" before making the nomination, although it's a bit difficult to tell if the subject of the article is more about the spell checking software or the company itself.

In either case, there doesn't seem to be much in terms of notability. Searches don't come up with anything besides basic existence, or that such-and-such platform has a plugin for this, etc. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I found nothing to establish a pass of WP:GNG. passing mention here, no results on Newspapers.com, very few results and no sigcov comes up in a search.Eddie891 Talk Work 01:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Surely useful, but not notable. TheodoreIndiana (talk) 14:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.