Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web2project
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Web2project[edit]
- Web2project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Caseydk&oldid=278253686, there's no product yet so it can't be notable yet. Doesn't look like db-spam and I can't db-notability software, so taking to AfD. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless more sources can be added. Basket of Puppies 03:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No prejudice against re-creating it once the software has been released and has received third-party reviews. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, yet more non-consumer task management software. Does every single one of these packages think marketing on Wikipedia is the way to go? - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No claim of meeting WP:Notability, and none found in gsearch. The parent project, dotProject, also isn't coming up with notability, so a redirect probably isn't a good option here.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.