Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Mortals Are (film)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to All You Need is Kill#Movie adaption. —Tom Morris (talk) 03:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- We Mortals Are (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This film has not entered production and may never be made. WP:NFF is very clear cut about films not having stand-alone pages dedicated to them until they enter principal photography. It should be deleted. Krevans (talk) 07:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is a pretty piece of WP:CRYSTAL, but it doesn't have enough here to pass WP:NFILM. It can be re-created when reliable sources become available.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:06, 27 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Yes, this one is WP:TOOSOON. In consideration that the attachment of actor Tom Cruise and director Doug Liman for a film version of the Hiroshi Sakurazaka novel, perhaps some place could be found to which this could be written of and sourced as a project-in-planning.[1][2][3][4] Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to All You Need is Kill#Movie adaption where this planned sci-fi film adaptation is now mentioned and sourced. While it's TOOSOON for a separate article, policy instructs how best we deal with discussion of anticipated events. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:59, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect per Schmidt, that should make everybody happy. Austrian (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as above Pol430 talk to me 21:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.