Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We're gonna win the league

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 00:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We're gonna win the league[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD; original rationale was "non-notable sports song." I stand by it, and would like to add that I'm shocked that this article has remained unchallenged since August 2006! Giant Snowman 11:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:40, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - definitely not a notable song, realistically what sort of "significant coverage" could be given to a song of unknown authorship with only two different lines of "lyrics".......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. When a song article consists entirely of lyrics, it's a decent bet that it's non-notable. This wouldn't appear to be an exception. No sign of sources to establish notability. Alzarian16 (talk) 12:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Not of notability. Author fails to state reliable sources. Article is only inclusive of lyrics, and is definitely not a popular song. Who's gonna win the league? Which club's song is that? EspañolDaLanguage!AmorEspaña! (talk) 15:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenal are! Wummer71 (talk) 09:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki to WikiSource. --Dweller (talk) 16:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Giant Snowman 16:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because. --Dweller (talk) 16:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I've heard worse reasons... Giant Snowman 16:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

:-)--Dweller (talk) 18:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete Not encyclopedic and not notable--Shrike (talk) 20:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable song. Argyle 4 Life^talk 00:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment: There are tons of sources in Google News Archive[1] and Google Books[2]. Most are RS and many do mention the song. However, most of them are only brief mentions and do not address the song as a whole. I would not be shocked if someone found an overview in RS somewhere. If that were to happen I would go with keep. Cptnono (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to For He's A Jolly Good Fellow. This chant is a variant of that song. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 12:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.