Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wave a dead chicken
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anas talk? 21:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wave a dead chicken[edit]
- Wave a dead chicken (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
A computer jargon definition with no possibility of expansion. Violates WP:NOT#DICTIONARY Clarityfiend 18:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable neologism. A google search only reveals references in various online dictionaries (often devoted to computer or tech slang). I did not see references in reliable, secondary sources. A google news search for the phrase resulted in zero hits. If secondary sources establishing that this is a notable neologism are added in the next few days maybe we could keep it, otherwise it should be deleted.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 18:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per WP:NOT#DICTIONARY and WP:NEO. Cool Bluetalk to me 19:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per here. Astrale01talkcontribs 21:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I really, really want to say keep - the rationale here is that the Jargon File is (ostensibly) not populated by neologisms. Problem, though, is that while this isn't really a neologism, it's still a dicdef. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not dictionary, not neologism, unless it can be a full article, see above. Bearian 16:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per various criteria inc WP:NOT#DICT and WP:ATT EyeSereneTALK 08:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or move to Wikitionary this is a purely dictionary post.Dan Gluck 14:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.