Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water to the Soul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sherrié Austin. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Water to the Soul[edit]

Water to the Soul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album barely notable. Colorhaus does not have its own article. One source is Answers.com which is not reliable and barely mentions the album anyway. The other is an Allmusic review which is the only reliable source about the album. Redirect to Sherrié Austin declined. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 12:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Sherrié Austin. Turning this into an article on Colourhaus seemed a possible option but I don't think the band or this album received enough coverage to make it worthwhile. Colourhaus and this album seem to be adequately covered in the Sherrié Austin article so a redirect there makes sense. --Michig (talk) 13:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - "Innocent Child" was a popular song on the radio in the 1990s, No.10 in airplay at KDWB FM in Minneapolis, Minnesota and No.50 on Billboard. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - WRT "WP:NOTINHERITED", an album can be discussed in its article in terms of its constituent songs, this is referred to as a "top-down approach", since "Innocent Child" was a Colorhaus song. WRT "WP:ITSNOTABLE", the songs on the album have charted on Billboard with airplay in a major city. The album article is "more than a track listing" per WP:NALBUM. The album "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it", while the hit single "has appeared on [a] country's national music chart" and "was in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network". --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NALBUMS, section Albums: "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting." Although the article has some content, a redirect is in the spirit of the guideline. North America1000 17:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.