Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water & Bubbles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 17:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Water & Bubbles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Nominating for deletion as a page created by User:Mr. Lama, a confirmed sockpuppet of User:Giovannigiulio.~~ Fails WP:GNG. Article has not been sourced since its creation.. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. This article was created 2013-12-21 and the relevant blocks were not imposed until January 2015. G5-type deletions are meant only to make block evasion ineffectual, not to punish pre-block bad behaviour. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by admins since 2006. (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article meets guidelines, in this case it doesn't matter who created it.--5 albert square (talk) 01:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the nominator completely changed their rationale in the middle of the discussion, making the subsequent comments by User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz and User:5 albert square nonsensical. I restored and strikethrough the previous rationale, as it should have been made. Cavarrone 06:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Whatever the rationale was, there is an obvious lack of WP:BEFORE. Passes GNG, and being the first 3D animated TV series ever produced in Italy, as noted in the Variety article cited in the article, makes the series historically notable. As noted in other AfDs started by the nominator, if Mr. Lama/Giovannigiulio was ever disruptive, nomitator is being disruptive as well, possibly more, mass-nominating dozens of articles in a few minutes with spurious rationales and not caring about their actual notability. Cavarrone 07:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Created by a sock, but edited by multiple editors since then; sourced fine enough and hardly a deletion candidate. Nate • (chatter) 08:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.