Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wassana Im-Em

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wassana Im-Em[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not for free profile. Nothing significant in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 09:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable per se, lack of RS, etc. Agricola44 (talk) 16:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, regretfully. While the subject is influential in her field, her work isn't enough to satisfy WP:NACADEMIC, nor does she meet the GNG herself. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACADEMIC. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 18:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.