Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warworld (Transformers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No assertion of notability, no sources, implausible redirect. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warworld (Transformers)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a fictional spaceship that seems to consist of no more than original research and plot summary. All I can find for this spaceship is Wikis of various kinds and primary sources, ie. nothing that can establish notability. Reyk _YO! 03:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Redirect back to a page covering the comic series the Warworld appeared in - Transformers: Generation 2 (comics). Mathewignash (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~Merge Completely "in universe". No notability no references. A pretty useless thing to leave as a redirect. Polargeo (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Information: There are over a dozen artiles which link to this one, which is why I consider a redirect a better option, since it would give those links a place to go. Mathewignash (talk) 13:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment: I agree. When something is linked from many places, it's always best it leads to something, even if it's only a redirect to a brief mention. JIP | Talk 20:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Anything that links to a redirect would have to be dealt with to give it a better target or just unlinked anyway, therefore keeping as a redirect is not a solution.~~ It would only be viable if this was a valid search term but it is not a likely search term because of the parenthesis. Polargeo (talk) 12:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not likely to ever make a viable article and so in this case links to it are not useful and also it will not help someone when they are redirected to your suggested target Transformers: Generation 2 (comics) which has no information whatsoever on "Warworld" Polargeo (talk) 12:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 19:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 19:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No assertion of notability, no substantiation by reliable third-party sources; fails WP:IINFO. --EEMIV (talk) 02:18, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or redirect per User:Mathewignash, worthy of at least a mention, even if the plot summary is too much. JIP | Talk 08:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Without information from secondary sources there is nothing to merge. Also, violates the WP:NOT#PLOT policy. Abductive (reasoning) 06:34, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is unsourced so per Wikipedia:Verifiability, the information cannot be merged. Additionally, this page is an implausible redirect due to the parentheses in the title. Cunard (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.