Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warriors Day Parade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Canadian National Exhibition. czar 03:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warriors Day Parade

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no evidence of notability for this event in the article as accepted, but perhaps these is evidence elsewhere DGG ( talk ) 08:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Canadian National Exhibition. Currently briefly mentioned there; could become a small section. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge - I think this article is notable, though I recognize it could be seen as fringe, in which case a merge would be appropriate. I've found these articles (1 2 3) and updated the page accordingly. AviationFreak💬 15:32, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. On a second look, I found that the parade is the subject of a plaque conferred by the Ontario Heritage Trust (see [1]). I put a pic of the plaque in the article. These plaques are fairly common, so I don't think it's necessarily enough to keep a standalone article, but thought I'd mention in any event. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Notable enough to keep but probably doesn't need it's own page blindlynx (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - There might be just barely enough sourcing to make a case for notability, but per WP:NOPAGE it seems like it makes the most sense to expand the content in the parent article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.