Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Masilamony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:06, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Masilamony[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:BEFORE search turned up his LinkedIn profile and his ZoomInfo profile, and that was about it. The only citation in the article which is specifically about him is a non-WP:RS interview (1). The fact that almost everything in his filmography is redlinked is not encouraging. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:NBIO. Narky Blert (talk) 06:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like the subject should be notable with the number of production credits they potentially have, but I cannot find anything like the required level of independent reliable sources required for GNG or NSUBJECT. If the credits could be reliably referenced I could probably be convinced to change to keep. Aoziwe (talk) 12:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.