Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warina Hussain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Loveyatri. Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warina Hussain[edit]

Warina Hussain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Warina Hussain

Actress with one major role, who therefore does not meet acting notability guidelines. This title has been cut down to a redirect to Loveyatri, her major role, and expanded to an article several times, most recently by a sockpuppet. A review of the references shows that she also does not satisfy general notability, because they are mostly puff pieces promoting her.

Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary
1 news18.com Wishing Happy Birthday to subject, but deleted as 404 ? No No No
2 anandabazar.com A promotional interview No Yes N/A No
3 indianexpress.com Announcement about the subject No Yes Probably No
4 TimesofIndia.com A puff piece about a video, promoting her No Yes No No
5 siasat.com Announcement that she will make a Tollywood debut No Yes Probably No
6 koimoi.com A puff piece about an upcoming film No Yes Probably No
7 zeenews.india.com Another puff piece about another upcoming film No Yes Probably No
8 ndtv.com Pre-announcement of her major 2018 film Yes Yes Yes No

As an Alternative to Deletion, the article should be cut down to a redirect to Loveyatri again, and the redirect should be given extended-confirmed protection so that a neutral editor can create an article when one of her films in progress is released. Until then, the title should be redirected. (Cutting the article down to a redirect by normal editing would only result in edit-warring.) Robert McClenon (talk) 20:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.