Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warilla Grove

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warilla Grove[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor and clearly non-notable shopping mall. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A search on NewsBank of Australian newspapers brings up 75 results. Many newspapers are not yet digitised in Australia, so there are likely sources not digitised yet. They include references in Illawarra Mercury (Wollongong, Australia) (74) and Sydney Morning Herald, The (Australia) (1). A quick search of they Sydney Morning Herald's website pulls up two trivial mentions like this one and this one that support this. Articles included are not one event, and cover several things including issues with anchor stores, a lottery ticket winner who purchased their ticket at the mall, a local taxi programme to provide local residents a taxi each way to the mall for $3, a theft of $30,000 from a store in the mall. --LauraHale (talk) 18:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These are trivial mentions. They are not sufficient to establish notability, according to WP:ORG. Run-of-the-mill mall life such as police incidents, winners who purchased their ticket at the mall, taxi programmes etc. do not help to establish notability for the mall. Till I Go Home (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:GNG. Laurahale's search proves to me only trivial coverage exists. All malls experience theft, have someone win some money, no coverage exists about actual mall history, economic impact on region etc. LibStar (talk) 14:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:02, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't see how this is notable.Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:50, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. LauraHale's results seem to indicate the absence of in-depth coverage. I conducted a Google search for ("warilla grove") and looked through the first 200 results; I found no evidence of significant third-party coverage. Google News yielded one hit: "$5000 fine for selling cigarettes to minor". The absence of any but trivial coverage persuades me that this fails WP:ORG. Ammodramus (talk) 01:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Number of ghits won't suffice. We need substantial independent multiple coverage in RSs. The mentions indicated are clearly trivial.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.