Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warhawk ranking and awards system
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 03:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Warhawk ranking and awards system (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a game guide. Aagin, prod removed four days in. Pagrashtak 19:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I see no reliable sources that establish notability. I intended to say that this should be merged into the Warhawk article, but I think everything that deserved to be moved into Warhawk (PlayStation 3 game) is already there. — Ksero 20:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Its all game guide material and cruft. Delete it fast. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 23:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as borderline game-guide material and (WP:NOT) and for placing undue weight on a minor aspect of the game. All that needs to be said can be summed up in prose within a couple of sentences.Someone another 07:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think it needs to be removed. If this was going to be added in, it could be incorporated in the main add. businessman332211 19:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins 11:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DO not delete! Wikipedia is not a football guide either, but the article should explain that different scores ie touchdown, fieldgoal, get different points. That would hardly constitute a " how to guide" on football. How is it that it constitutes the same here?. If this is going to be deleted so does info on basketball scores, baseball rules sections etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.32.9.161 (talk) 19:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.