Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wapbaze
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. not notable, rubbish "refs", promotional tone Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Wapbaze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Video hosting (pirating?) site with no particular claim to notability. I cannot find any significant coverage of the site (or its founder, also listed below) in independent reliable sources.
... discospinster talk 21:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Zero coverage find via Google. The cited sources are affiliated or Top X lists, plus Alexa. Largoplazo (talk) 00:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think you ought to have combined the deletion discussion for KellyChi with this one, but delete that too. The only claim of significance made for him is the creation of this unremarkable website. Largoplazo (talk) 00:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.