Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Fei (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:26, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Fei (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references for a WP:BLP; both external links are from chineseculture.net, which according to the opening paragraphs is a website created by her. Most of the Google results of "Wang Fei" + "guqin" are from guqin.org, which again is something created by her. Honestly, while founder of North American Guqin Association sounds impressive, the truth is barely anyone in North America has heard of guqin, much less play or appreciate it, so I'm not sure how notable this makes her. Also worth mentioning is that Wang Fei (musician) originally redirected to Faye Wong, so even if the article is kept, it needs to be renamed somehow as a pop singer is also a musician. Timmyshin (talk) 21:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 5 albert square (talk) 23:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have renamed to Wang Fei (guqin player) cannot stay at (musician) given Wang Fei (singer) but probably delete. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and maybe draft/userfy - Unless good Chinese sources are found, I didn't find much aside from a few mentions here. SwisterTwister talk 04:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 15:36, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.