Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wandile Sihlobo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wandile Sihlobo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, not enough on his book for him to meet WP:NAUTHOR, and with a high citation count in the single digits and an h-index of 4, doesn't meet WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete I found [1] a single in-depth profile for GNG but it does not seem to be from a reputable source. Apart from that, he clearly fails WP:NPROF. --hroest 15:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NPROF, sources aren’t in-depth either and don’t meet WP:GNG. -Xclusivzik (talk) 00:37, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.