Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wan Xiaoli
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. Stifle (talk) 13:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wan Xiaoli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Insufficient assertion of notability. Unless notability shown, delete. --Nlu (talk) 15:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Per WP:N TheAsianGURU (talk) 19:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you're going to call for a speedy delete, please specify which of the criteria listed at WP:CSD it satisfies. cab (talk) 00:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 15:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 15:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep quite sufficient coverage from reliable sources: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL cab (talk) 00:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable popular musician, has a wide reputation in his genre (PRC "college folk"), two albums, meets WP music notability guidelines. Deletion proposal is disruptive and proposer did not send a message to the creator of the page. Improve, don't delete. We must not denigrate the contributions of other long-time, productive editors by impoverishing rather than enriching our content. The article is a stub because the creator of the article is not fluent in Chinese and was hoping that other editors with more skill would add to it. We are a collaborative project and should act in such a manner, not attempting to destroy others' contributions in an arbitrary and damaging way (and, in fact, this editor has stated that s/he refuses to inform creators of articles that s/he AFDs--inexcusable. Badagnani (talk) 03:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per cab. --Bardin (talk) 08:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - appears to be enough significant coverage for WP:N.--BelovedFreak 23:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:Music#Others. Me what do u want? Your Hancock Please 12:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.