Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waltzing Matilda Aviation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waltzing Matilda Aviation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was removed but without a valid reason. Not a notable company, as the size of their fleet and the lack of proper secondary sources indicate. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree that this fails NCORP, based on available sourcing.--- Possibly (talk) 02:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This company has announced operations firmly beginning in Fall 2021. Previous editor deleted sources. This operator is notable due to fleet expansion / orders / options with deliveries over next few months. Operator is positioned to become direct competitor with Porter Airlines given fleet expansion of Dash 8 Q400 aircraft and FAR Part 121 service. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyguyairlines (talk • contribs) 2021-04-01T15:04:20 (UTC)
- … none of which is at all relevant. Where has this company been independently documented in depth by identifiable people with good reputations for fact checking and accuracy? Please point to that. That shows notability. Our personal opinions of how important something is are not relevant. Nor are company press releases. Uncle G (talk) 09:22, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NCORP. PR coverage only. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not have enough news coverage. Expertwikiguy (talk) 02:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.