Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Figueira

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Figueira[edit]

Walter Figueira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:13, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)*Then let's delete it. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No senior appearances yet therefore he isn't notable per WP:NFOOTY. He may well get senior appearances in the future but we can recreate the article then and not before per WP:CRYSTALL as it isn't a certainty that he'll make any senior appearances. The article lacks references too. IJA (talk) 07:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.