Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Bublé

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:36, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Walter_Bublé[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recommend for deletion as not meeting the notability criteria for WP:BIO. The notability of this commercial specialty illustrator does not appear to have any validation by independent sources. The only reference on the page is to the subject's own web site. Claims that his work is represented in the FASNY Museum of Firefighting are not substantiated by their own web site and in any case it's not clear whether they are meant to be in the fine art collection or as collectible gifts in the museum store. No books or publications seem to mention him, and the only news media mention is the subject's own announcement of a benefit breakfast to be held by the local Loyal Order of Moose. Shorn again (talk) 00:37, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No sign of significan independent coverage. Johnbod (talk) 02:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject of the article fails to meet the notability criteria by a wide mark, and the sources that do establish anything at all are, in some way or another, compromised and unreliable. --[[User:Qwerty_Binary|Qwerty Binary]] ([[User_talk:Qwerty_Binary|talk]]) (talk) 08:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable, and essentially non- encyclopedic. No reason to keep...Modernist (talk) 13:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.